Why Didn't Romeo approach Juliet

“Lo barappa tindi madbarona, ivattu saturday; late aadre , it will be rush. Hage barappa alliyaru Juliet illa baa!”, said Romeo's friend.

Romeo: is it necessary to take in Juliet always in the discussion? I dont know why my parents kept my name as Romeo, “RWJ” could have been better.

Romeo's friend: whats that!

Romeo: Romeo without Juliet!... ha ha.

Both laugh, discussion goes on, covering topic about some of most irrelevant topics that they have found either in facebook or twitter or in there company. Its a 10 min walk from where they live, to a near by resturant. Its a daily routine to both, walking along the same lane, watching beyound horizon, watching out for new things in their unchanged and unchangable area. For Romeo's friend its always same, nothing make much difference, either a new restaurant or new neighbour or new girl next door. Romeo couldn't have bothered much of all these things except about new girl who have rented apartment in their lane.

Aristippus: Aha! Thats my boy. A girl , what kind of Girl? Sexy, hot or ok ok type. ? What you want from that girl? Is it...

RWJ: oh oh...wait a min before you assume thing who are you??

Aristippus: Me, i am student of Socrates ,founder of hedonism; the philosophy of pleasure . I am the guy who said physical pleasure are more powerful then mental one; which people say i proved it by keeping prostitute in my house.

RWJ: dude !!! pros. Come on that too in house.

Aristippus: you drink right. You also smoke right.

RWJ: yes thats true. But why that question?

Macintrye: Because I , Macintrye, long back asked “What is good for Human Being?”. Aristippus was one of thefirst who came out with answer ,that pleasure is the one thats good for humans.

Aristippus: Before , you RWJ, get confused let me introduce Macintrye , you know his question right. His question brought storm in philosopy . Before you also ask “whats happening?”, i would like to inform you that what ever happening ,is happening in your mind, your physical body is safe ; is safely walking with all normal funtion, with your friend.

RWJ: whats is it all for.

Epicurus: you will get to know by the end of discussion.

Aristippus: why on earth you came along, had he read you?

Epicurus: Aaha, discussion need me, i need to contradict you about your notion of physical pleasure. What you say Macintrye?

Macintrye: kalá eípe(well said), human culture is filled with emotivism. Its void of rational argument. And as you know socrates once said “people dont see same things when they are under emotive grip ”. our role is only tell RWJ whats right and wrong.

Aristippus: you and your relativism. Physical pleasure is rational thing.

Epicurus : you are misleading RWJ.

Aristippus: AHa me leading him , my comtemporary, its 21 century ...wake up,its not your time of 3rd century B.C. Let me ask some questions to RWJ if he permits.

Aristippus say pointing towards still confused, awkardly looking RWJ.

RWJ: me!! questions!!! ok.

Aristippus: why do you smoke ? Why do you drink? Why you keep cigartte box in your pocket? Why is Bacardi in your cupboard?

RWJ: wow!!wow! Slow down, i am not going to answer you all these, its my personal matters dude. Its about privacy.

Epicurus: would you want us dig into it, we are in you mind , we do have access to all.

Seemingly more confused RWJ replies: well then, here is thing. I like smoking, its gives me a kind of pleasure. I am addicted to it now so i keep it. About drinking i occasionally drink, i love rum.

Aristippus : thats what i am talking about. Its about pleasure, your pleasure. Pleasure from smoking, pleasure from drinking. Pleasure from working etc right.

RWJ: Right

Epicurus: Dont put words in his mouth Aristippus!

Aristippus: RWJ is hedonist of my type, not of yours. He like physical pleasure, he goes to party, he enjoy being lazy, he enjoy watching porn. He is classical hedonist.

Epicurus: well well, if he is hedonist , let me ask him question about girls. Why do you like that girl? Is it because you badly want to get physical pleasure by seeing her or do you want have sex with her? Or would you like to go to prostitute in order to full fill your sexual desire.

RWJ: Are you insane, are you out of your mind. Is It my mind asking these stupid question? I better shut it down.

Socrates: wow wow! RWJ dont do that, we are sorry, i will apologise on behalf of these. They dont have idea of indology. But these are question to be answer. And i would like to request to my fellow philosopher to frame question that have cultural sensitivity.

M K Gandhi : Yes well said socrates, soul is not combination or permutation of all the available solutions and know resposnes of the body, its not sofware. Its beyond that. RWJ you will discover it.

Aristippus: let RWJ respond.

RWJ: well i now know what Aristippus want to convey. Its not about sex. Ya it can be said that indian culture is not open system, which doesnt mean that we have sexual desire, so strong that we like girl only because of that. Its about some thing that makes my heart beat faster than normal, its, that make me to come out with good dress to resturant, its what make me to see again and again across the table to have just a look at her. Its about things called decency that props up when she cross us. Its calm me down, its her look that make my proud eyes to find things in air. Its my desire to be in relationship, a relationship of care , a relationship which is trust worthy.

Gilligan: well said RWJ, its me Gilligan who introduced Ethics of care in this male dominated world of non emotivism. You are right what you say about care part in your answer.

Aristippus: RWJ, you said you are addicted to smoke, why often you smoke, is it that if you dont smoke again again, what do you loose.? Is it pleasure ? Or do you smoke to keep pain out.

Epicurus: do you want to prove RWJ a hedonist of your type. Again.

RWJ: let me answer this Epicurus, yes i need to smoke again and again beause it need to . pleasure from it dont last. But you cant equate that to “looking again and again towards her to have pleasure which according to you is physical pleasure.”

Plato : where is socrates? why cant socrates tell us about Desire.?

Epicurus: rememeber he never wrote book, you are the one who wrote on his behalf. That what RWJ mind knows, so you better speak.

Plato: ham .. all i can say is about 3 things : logos, thumos, appetumia.

Epictetus: dude no greek!

Plato: well-come Epitetus. The derivator of habit. Let me now concentrate on appetumia ie desires, appetite. Humans does have desires, which are natural. Its upto the guy in question weather he want to pursue the desire, which may make person pleasure seeking, which might boil down to wealth seeking.

Epictetus: i can add that if this thought is not controlled by a choice which every one has , will lead to habit. Its same as RWJ has smoking habit. He do have a choice of not to smoke and pursue other mental desire.

Epicurus: discussion is going out of control, our dude will never understable his current dilemma. Nimanna bitre harikatene bardabidtira.

Aristippus: so its not about physical pleasure, when you see her.

RWJ: i am sure its not about physical pleasure, its more like mental pleasure. I kind of agree with Epicurus's mental pleasure.

Epicurus: I suppose Aristippus got the answer, RWJ might be hedonist of your type in smoking which i call pleasure which is not natural and not necessary. But in this case desire to have companion is a pain which RWJ is reducing by seeing forward to that girl, which he might end up by proposing her.

RWJ: Hold on a second.... dont you think Epicurus, you are going way beyond your imagination.

Bentham: every desire need to have motive; motive will search for action and action will give you outcome. When you have desire to be close to her, then why not have motive of proposing her and having relationship.

RWJ: who are you?

Aristotle: I always talked about purpose and point , ends and means to get happiness. But people side lined me, they all now listen to Bentham, the guy who just spoke with you RWJ.

RWJ: WOW! What now, i suppose discussion about pleasure and pain is over or what?

Epicurus: Kind of, we are guides, we dont decide we just suggest, its you who need to decide.

RWJ: so my looking at girls while walking along road, in resturant, office etc is natural or is it habit which will boil down to a bad character trait.?

Epicurus: Yes , they are natural but !!!

Plato: you need to control your desires and urges. Concentrate more on mental pleasures. As Epictetus said you do have a choice. making no choice in your desire for pleasure is a bad habit, especially in case of sexual desire , that to in India, where social rules are strong.

Immenual Kant: RWJ , in society like Indian, autonomy is less. Here concept of heteronomy rules ie you cant decide for yourself. But there are section of society in your own society which encouarge autonomy. So are you an autonomous person or you accept heteronomy.?

RWJ: does autonomy means having free will in all aspects of life.

Kant: No, treating yourself autonomus means ,you are neither the end nor the means of the project.

RWJ: what !!! speak in english boss.

Kant: it means, in simple word you must not be mean person, or you dont use people to get what you needed.

RWJ: what does this question have to do with girl?

Kant: i have doubt that you might want that girl because she is hot or she is rich or something else?

RWJ: 1st point i dont know her, we havent met yet. But it might that she is beautiful. Is it wrong to be with beautiful people.

Kant: there is nothing wrong in being with, unless you have a wrong intention to persue.

RWJ: define wrong intention?

Kant: getting in relation only to have physical pleasure? Or cheating her ?

RWJ: no not so , i dont have such intention. Can we go beyond this pleasure topic?

Kant: why?

M K Gandhi: In India speaking about sex is taboo. You all have started to use word” physical plaesure ” instead of sex. That Indian effect.

Kant : Answer then: are you ready to marry any girl of any region, religion, caste etc if you like her? Do you have reservation of any kind to any thing regarding a girl that you want to marry? These are gerenal question , not specific to that girl.

RWJ: i am autonomus person as per my definition; i choose for my self. But i cant guarantee the same of my family.

Kant: so you are saying your family believes in contemporary social marriage laws of you religion. Right.

RWJ: yes

Kant: Then i can say that ,they can be heteronomist to you in certain issue like marriage etc. What about your reservations?

RWJ: i do have general reservation, may be i haven't thought about it.

Kant: if you have reservation and you have historical reason to be heteronomist, then there is tendency to not to respect autonomy and hence be heteronomist toward your girl. Which may have different consequence than you are intended in the first place.

RWJ: ooh..ufoo i am getting confused now, cant you explain in simple words.?

Kant: every one has the same query about my explaination. Here is thing , there is concept of “free will “ which helps to choose things and is upholder of autonomy. If you dont have autonomy ,you may not wish to encourage it either, which might be detrimental to the free will of your love one, which might make them unhappy. Not respecting autonomy distort the intention which may bring different and undesirable consequences.

Gilligan: kant want to say that you may think, you have good intention but inherently you may not and hence your action and consequence may go wrong.

RWJ: ham! He may be right. I havent discovered much. And i dont know her intention, or what type of person she is ? Whats she values?

Aristotle : what do you think about means to get her? Do you have clarity about your goal? Do you have accountibility of these goals?

RWJ: what? She is not thing , so that i need to find means to get her.

Aristotle: my apologise; means meaning ways to get in touch with her.

RWJ: I havent thought about it, however i dont want to be seen has jerk when i approach her.

Aristotle: it means , you want to have frame work of socially approved character traits. Right

RWJ: yes and can approaching a stranger that to a girl is socially execptable?

Aristotle : approaching a girl is not a wrong thing unless you have wrong intention for approach. But is the approach itself wrong intention. May not be so ,its ends, ends are good and means are also good. But does your culture allow it ? Yes it may or may not. If your culture doesnt allow , then it might be termed as vice. In your word being a jerk.

Aristotle : let me ask you question. Where do you find the happiness. Is it in Honour? Is it in Pleasure ? Or Is it in wealth?

RWJ: isn't happiness independent of these?

Aristotle : offcourse it is independent. According to me these all give happiness, no doubt about it. But its virtue such as honesty brings real happiness. Its above all.

RWJ: you mean to say i must not show off my wealth, pleasure and honours to get to my loved one. Instead i need to be honest and not try to make up the things.

Aristotle : right. And we dont have control over your character traits but we do have control over our actions. These need to be channelised so that it become a habit, a virtue habit. Like being courages.

RWJ: if happiness is end Aristotle, what if my happiness is in contradiction of my family happiness, who are heteronomist.?

Aristotle : you need to check with the concept of Duty vs Happiness of kant.

Kant: here i am.

RWJ: do you have questions?

Kant: a lot of . To whom does these duties belong to ? Is it duty for sake of duty or Does it have elements of inclination. Inclination meaning intention of duty.

RWJ: what is duty for sake of duty?

Kant: people do their duty for sake of happiness, for sake of social compulsion, for sake of honour, for sake of status etc. Have you every done a duty without expecting reward or praise or when it hasn't given happiness . If yes ,then such duties are “duty for sake of duty”. In Nepotism, corruption people perform duty for sake of other things , these type are inclined duties. Hope you got the point.

RWJ: yes! But what how does this links with happiness and how this could stop me for not being happy.

Kant: man according to me has duty to be happy however its may not be strict duty. Strict duties comes with rights, that is right of others for whom your duties are directed to.

Aristotle: i can add a point that your upbringing could effect how you persue the things.

Kant: yes aristotle is right. Family is your upbringing unit. So do you have duty towards them ? Are they strict duties or meritorious? To what extent you are ready to sacrifice thing like feeling, happiness, pleasure, wealth to perform your duty.? What if your family doesnt approve your relation? So will you sacrifice your happiness, your pleasure of being with your girl etc for sake of family ? Or are you ready to conserve happiness of your girl and perform duty of relationship without caring duties of your family?

RWJ: Now i am getting why you people never got committed. Is deciding ,to be in relationship so difficult.?

Kant: RWJ, you havent answered my question.

RWJ: yes my family as all indian families are... is culture centric. Caste and religion are undiffering issues when it comes to marriage. But as i am autonomous i can make duty towards my family as non strict duty. However i will and need to maintain good will towards both duties ie both for family and loved girl. Does it morally stands, kant?

Kant: it may. Good will is good because of your intentions. If your intentions are good towards your loved girl and family, then consequences will be good. But i can be good in my societal frame work, indian society is different. You better know it, RWJ.

Ross: RWJ, i am W D Ross, there are some prima facie duties that need to taken care of.

1. duty of Gratitude: i.e towards your parents.
2. duty of justice: towards both girl and family.
3. duty of self improvement : not getting much in mess like these.
4. duty of fidelity: both implicit and explicit.

RWJ: Ross does these apply same for every one.

Ross: may not be so, each case is differnet. But some times some socially acceptable norms or utilitarian norms does take precedent to your thought.

J S Mill: yes in society, things works in utilitarian frame work.

RWJ: what does that mean?

J S Mill: greater happiness for greater number of people. Which means to say if the act that creates happiness for large number must be encouraged. Which may boil down to arugement that marraiges must happen with broad concent.

RWJ: Mill dont you think that it can be contested? And what about right of those who doesnt agree with majority in family frame work?

J S Mill: now you are becoming good learner. Yes it has been contested. However intra caste marriages , intra religious marriages have social acceptance because they are on majority side. Inter caste or inter religious marriages brings happiness to some section but for broader section , they dont get happiness. It might be beacasue of society being heteronomy rather than autonomous. This may not be good but its acceptable and these socially acceptable things doesnt come with pain for society. Its society point of view.

RWJ: what about right?

J S Mill: yes individual have right, which till now society hasn't learnt much to respect, but hope it will especially indian society will learn. Hope inter caste and inter religion and region marraiges become utilitarian in concept.

Aristippus: RWJ, have you ever thought that , to approach a girl you need to think so much so that you forgot what you want.

RWJ: Ham! Thats true i am normal person, i thought these people will discuss and will conclude the thing, making my work easy, but no, they havent. Things are much more complicated now.

Aristippus: ha ha ... now you know ,you might be thinking that why i am being with them brought out simple and straight forward concept of pleasure.

RWJ: no Aristippus you are not right now! You are right about physical pleasure and lust but not about other thing. Life doesnt just revolve around pleasure.

Socrates/Plato: very well said, we achieved what we intended to. We never give conclusion, we suggest, its you who have to decide. We will be present when you have dilemma, dilemma is good.

Gilligan: Excuse me!! i have question for all male scholars and to you RWJ. ?

Every say in corus : what ? Questions ? Not now...

Gilligan : Have you ever thought ,what girl might be thinking about RWJ and what are her thought about all your big thoughts?

End of mental conversation

“Yenadru order madappa, asta guraisi nodbedpa. Yed hogyalu”, said Romeo's earth friend. As he said Romeo got back to this world only to see that girl has gone out of sight.

The Tribe

My first fiction: Its about how Aryan tribe formed

The Tribe

Long long ago, in the far far east to our civilization, there happen to be a land ; a land covered by great mountains on all three side and water on the rare side, a land where wandering men and women rod wild horses, hunted and domesticated animals for fur and meat , collected wild berries. Centuries passed families developed into small tribes, which started to occupy traversal stretch of grass land. As time passed small tribes developed into communities, each connected with various form of relations both blood and non blood. As differentiation increased specialties developed, marked by there geography and harshness of land. Over time as tribes expanded in numbers, new resource became crucial. New way of generating food, protecting large population from cold and other harshness started to haunt people. With the generation of narrative knowledge, tribal elders came to conclusion of herding the still domesticated animals, leaving behind the culture of hunting and gathering of berries.

Years passed without constrains and population grew putting more pressure on the existing grass land, elders deviced expanding mission by sending out people across their know boundaries. To achieve the objective of forward expansion instrument of travelling was to revolutionised, elders looked towards grassland beast; horse. Horse were domesticated and herded. These became part of tribe ,as one of there own. Every time when expansion mission was sent new territory- grassland- was added. This led to streching of area to a vast and varied (little) geography. Vastness brought dis connectivity, which brought distinctiveness among people. Differentiation beame the obvious result. However this brought great strength to land( some were good at maintaing grassland, some at herding, some at herds controlling, some at predicting rain and thunderstorm) until strain on resources started again. This was confronted with the new discovery that land has been covered by mountains on three direction and sea on remaining direction. Elders of that time tried in futile to dig in the history(orally transmitted) to find solution. Society which now had developed social relation was on brink of collapse. Differenciantion that had brought protectors, wheelers, riders which was boon became bane. Tribal confict erupted, social relation brought differntial unification in the once flurishing society. Conflict turned into wars, death became friendly neighbour. Land was devastated in decades. Elders professed of return of lost man of their own kind who one day will bring lost message which will unite and draw the society out of the current crisis.

After years of search society found The Man with the Lost Message, the message he said came from sky. The message he said “is eternal truth and unalienable”. The Man message spread like grassland fire. Men tested The Man through their tradition and came to conclusion that he is one their own kind, who might be decedent of one of the numerous mission that were lost during the expansion age. The Man emphasised on the Lost Message and asked people to work for lost message rather than for him. Men from all around the vast land met and discussed with him. The Man with his charm influenced every one of them; some diagreed and some agreed. Convinced men rallied behind him. He travelled all across the known land learning things from various group and teaching new thing that he had learnt from The Lost Message. He was able to consolidate the social structure of the land into one. He gave new names to events, worships, and for processes, making communication shorter, understandable and brought some uniformity. He built up relationss with skilled mind of various tribes and brought them on unified platform. This platform became body where elders were able to discuss and solve some of the problem that society faced. On the suggestion of The Man, elders set mission to unify the land and bring under a single command . Unification was marked by agreement, voluntary submission, conditional submission and other methods which were unknown to society but was brought by The Man, which he said was the part of Lost Message. Other splinter groups who were treat were assimilated by war ,some time by assasination of leader, some time by corruting officials of chief of tribe, which ever method was deemed correct.

With the years of efforts by elders and politicking mind of The Man, finally land got united. Unity brought centrality, i became we . Uniformity became norms, diversity became devient. The Man defended this form of society for the greater good of larger people. He brought concept of sacrific for greater good and glorified it. People saw no harm in endorsing his idea as other solution were not giving stability. Stability has returned after much suffering and sacrifice-as The Man conceptualised it. Forces set by the new idea culminated into a tribal state, with central authority and an army. The state ;headed by council of elders:Deus,Dig,Das ,ruled fast land . Unified under the common command. As time was running out council of elders decided to address historically unsolved issue and directed to open the historical problem (as there was any script that time tribe had specialsed group of people who were tasked with memorising the important event and passing on to next generation in the form of stories-).

Deus being nominal head invited The Man for sharing his views and unearting the solution from The Lost Message. However tribal tradition allowed only son of the land to take such work. Moreover section of grand tribal society were decenting importance given to newcomer. To solve the stand of Deus decided to use the mole present in the tradition which allowed adoption of the son and no rule was made on adoted son rights. Deus adopted The Man as his son in a tribal ceremony, with the name Manus The son Of Deus.

Manus now as an entrusted man, had huge resposibility of finding way to non-availability of land. Deus once told him that whole stability of the unified people lies on the solution.Deus was guide and teacher for Manus with whom he used to share his ideas. Deus used have conversation in question and answer (as he deemed its the write method)format on various issues however restrained himself many times from asking Manus about The Lost Message. Deus always believed in Manus's in concept of going beyond the horizon and believed that this aspect has brought Manus to this land. He felt the land is secure and this great people ,will be the force of manus ,who will eventually find the solution. It took some time for Manus to adjust with new job whose rule were verbal deposited. Deus assigned Dig who being women was good in organisational skill and was key in bringing centrality , to assist Manus, Manus took it as sign and decided to organise an event to bring specialised people to work under Deus. This was to be fare were people would discuss things, would show talents, fighting skills, new herbal plants, fire controlling technique,food yelding techniqe, weapons,etc. This was open invitation to all corner of the land , which was being organised for the first time. Various groups and elders decided to meet on vast flat land just outside the place where council of elders was housed. Hundreds of families put there tent in that land which was cut by small streams. Various events went on from women warrior fighting men warriors to display of new animal captured in the land. People stayed there for weeks, which provided Dig and Manus to mark the skilled men and women and the skills itself, that could be needed to find the solution. During fare a pattern emerged which copied the recent events i.e now the place itself had council to over see the fair, basic necesity of food,shelter and water was taken care off. Residence were now in organised condition. Small protection force also protected the recidence. Miniaturised state was built and people started to call its Atsana. Dig saw a new system emerging which had division of labor, consists of various groups who were specialised in there own work but exchanged their labors mutually. Dig conceptualised first cosmopolitan city, born out of idea of Manus.

With coming of Manus in picture things have evolved: war were stopped, people got united, peace and stability returned, new big city by name “Atsana” was founded. People started to believe that time indeed is ripe to materialised the message in The Lost Message. Manus and Dig sensed the mood, with the permission of Deus, Das who was protector and warrior head of the council of elder was sent to spread the message of an invitation; an invitation as the first message of “The Lost Message”. Das, a self made man , a sceptic by nature hated phenomenon of blind following of leaders. Many a time he had opposed the pre destination which was engulping the society but this time allowed him self to not to oppose Manus worship(as he believed). Das trusted situation for the solution rather thann the pre destination. Being believer of self consciousness, he did discuss Manus phenomenon with Deus. Who in turn assure and asked Das to have faith in the young man.

It took some time for forces of Das to spread the message of Manus to choosen one (Some identified by Manus and Dig ) and in general to warriors(other came as voluteers.). Within weeks People pored into new established city of Atsana. Land to wards east of the city was given to the unorganised warriors and other skilled people. Manus was in between the crowd unable to organise . People although respected him but question of next haunted people. Seeing lack of Manus experience Dig and Das stepped in. It was new for them too, however there own experience of how Tsana was formed gave them the future path. Within hours of discussion , both came to conclusion of diffenciating, segregating and organising on the based of the common thing for this purpose. Question was to find the purpose; Manus was showing his inexperience which both realised and sought Deus intervention(hence went to house that housed council of elders).

In council of elders, Deus was having discussion with Vesu, the man who was instrumental in organising the Tsana city. Vesu being a merchant and retailer, was always know for his grouping skills which matched with changing situation and requirement. When Dig and Das entered council hall, humble vesu sought permission to suspend his discussion and went out, so that three heads can discuss the issue. Dig and Das explained the situation that is unfolding just east of the city. All three had seen situation like this before but this was lot different : had huge number -numbering in thousands, all type from warrior(the organised one) to alchemist were present, all level of boldness was present. It was becoming a recipe of spontenious revolt if not controlled and organised. What came out of discussion was need to organise the large crowd . Deus was able to see(Council house was on high ground over looking new city and crowd ) for himself, the growing need for cosmopolitan crowd control and people who can do so. Presence of Vesu made sense to Deus. After consulting Dig and Das, Vesu was asked to enter the discussion in the council hall. Vesu has sensed the help that council needed, which became clear during course of discussion. Deus was still testing the water, vesu got proposal from Dig regarding reorganising of the crowd. Though it wasn't unanimous suggestion, Deus and Das conformed to Dig's proposal. What moved them was Veus clarity and humbleness in analysing the proposal. Vesu had organisational questions before jumping to accept their proposal.

Vesu questions:

What is aim and objective of the organisation?

Who will be head of this and what kind of authority he/she have?

What part council and Manus play with respect to this organisation?

What are criteria of differnciation within organisation?

Maintenance of the same?

How organisation must proceed during choitic situation?

What will be relation of individual and organisation?

The question of Vesu cleared the smoke about vesu's outlook and were supporting plates for the proposal which the Deus and Das still had doubt. As problem was spontenous and unwarranted council wasn't prepared for the answers, however rule of sue moto readdressal was invoked(which was being followed when answer where to be sought from the questioner itself). Vesu after getting convinced that council had no answer, went a head with his proposal with all humbleness. Vesu made it clear that he himself dont have answer for much of the question but sought apply “ought to see when deemed necessary” principle, accordingly he would answer as on when situation arrive or situation get cleared. Council accepted his proposal and gave permission to take stock of the situation, however placed him under Manus and advised him to support Manus's effort. Vesu, after approval met Manus along with Dig among the what was to called by crowd as “Loya Gira” a grand council. Dig was more that happy to see two humble person working on the situation which even council can't think of. Dig saw it has first step towards division of power and share of responsibility. Two men had a long discussion, exchanged alot of information. Dig being well connected with centrality of society, was well fed with information of skills, technology, instrument and people connected with these things. Dig became repository to unearthen information which Manus and Vesu thought necessary for organising. After much of deliberation Manus and Vesu, now onwards the Dwi, came to conclusion that crowd would be divided based on skills rather than region, from which they belong. From the data ,which Dig has collected during previous fare, The Dwi decided to have each skilled group under certain men/ women (who are to be highly skilled in the same job).

It was time to convey the decision and make way for first line of organisational heads. Dig was lack of grandness of conveying decision which Dwi have left, hence he ordered a small platform to be made on the high ground facing crowd which council guards were quick to accomplish.Dig and Manus were not unknown to crowd but Vesu was, before Dig could start with introduction of Vesu, Vesu himself came oout with introduction as the head of the organisation which was going to be announced and he is working with the approval of council. Vesu took this opportunity to welcome all and thanking those who dreamt this. Vesu allowed Manus to begin with the core announcement which would define the aim, objective and criteria of organistion. Manus announced that an organsiation will be set up with the aim in line with aim of The Lost Message; ie to find solution for moving beyond this land, maintaining present order and peace of the land. He spelt that people will be segregated based on there skills and skill will be used for achiving the aims, giving prority to finding new land beyond mountains and sea. And he also added that these grouping will be called “Ganas” and will be lead by people appointed by them, who deemed fit and well scrutinised by them. Manus than allowed Vesu to announce Ganas and those who will be contacting council on behalf of them(as one amongs equal and leader). Vesu announced that he will spell out who will be representing organisation and categories of work under organisation and then(one by one).

Categories of Dwi were:

“Varuna”: Intelligence, law and order

.(Humbal, ethically uncorruptable ,was from fastest hordes of the north. Was part of Das messaing network, was brillent in identifying and training various animals to get things done , mapper and one who knows nature well:::: as described by Vesu to people )

“Agni” : Grassland care taker, wild fire preventer.

“Mitra” : would help Agni(Mitra was one of the son of Surya a tribal head: the far eastern tribe from colder area of land)

(Agni would be responsible for taking measure that would help in preventing fire in grassland there by giving more grass. He would also be responsible for preventing desert lands from spreading. Head of a group from easter land)

“Soma” : curing men/women. Also help Agni in picking useful herbs and protecting herbs with the help of Tvastra who was expert in herbs.

(basically soma was from tribal medic.)

“Yama” : sanitization which would include burying dead both human and aNimal: Yama was a tribe whose people were called and were part of society for burying dead and these were from south.

After all these anouncement there came final announcement which vesu left it for Dig. Dig announced that the organisation which she will annoounce will be fighting force, most of people will be part of it. It will be having more than one person over it. Primary objective is to explore the land beyond and this group will get every coordination from other groups. Main leaders she said will be

“Indra” : A most feared warrior, well know for fighting in all condition and expert in storming the defence during unwell condition such as snow storm, rain, thunderstorm etc. People thought that nothing could stop this young warrior.

“Pusan” : another son of Surya. Will be supporting Indra. Will be responsible for establishment of paths and taking inputs from Varuna. He was head of tribe which herded only along the roads hence were called as protector of roads by merachants of society.

“Aryaman” an young fighter will assist Indra.

“Rudra”: head of siegh machinary an expert in sabotage. Both physical and biological methods.

“Rbhus”: keeper of weapons.

... To Be Continued