Tuesday, 15 April 2014

The Tribe



My first fiction: Its about how Aryan tribe formed

The Tribe


Long long ago, in the far far east to our civilization, there happen to be a land ; a land covered by great mountains on all three side and water on the rare side, a land where wandering men and women rod wild horses, hunted and domesticated animals for fur and meat , collected wild berries. Centuries passed families developed into small tribes, which started to occupy traversal stretch of grass land. As time passed small tribes developed into communities, each connected with various form of relations both blood and non blood. As differentiation increased specialties developed, marked by there geography and harshness of land. Over time as tribes expanded in numbers, new resource became crucial. New way of generating food, protecting large population from cold and other harshness started to haunt people. With the generation of narrative knowledge, tribal elders came to conclusion of herding the still domesticated animals, leaving behind the culture of hunting and gathering of berries.

Years passed without constrains and population grew putting more pressure on the existing grass land, elders deviced expanding mission by sending out people across their know boundaries. To achieve the objective of forward expansion instrument of travelling was to revolutionised, elders looked towards grassland beast; horse. Horse were domesticated and herded. These became part of tribe ,as one of there own. Every time when expansion mission was sent new territory- grassland- was added. This led to streching of area to a vast and varied (little) geography. Vastness brought dis connectivity, which brought distinctiveness among people. Differentiation beame the obvious result. However this brought great strength to land( some were good at maintaing grassland, some at herding, some at herds controlling, some at predicting rain and thunderstorm) until strain on resources started again. This was confronted with the new discovery that land has been covered by mountains on three direction and sea on remaining direction. Elders of that time tried in futile to dig in the history(orally transmitted) to find solution. Society which now had developed social relation was on brink of collapse. Differenciantion that had brought protectors, wheelers, riders which was boon became bane. Tribal confict erupted, social relation brought differntial unification in the once flurishing society. Conflict turned into wars, death became friendly neighbour. Land was devastated in decades. Elders professed of return of lost man of their own kind who one day will bring lost message which will unite and draw the society out of the current crisis.

After years of search society found The Man with the Lost Message, the message he said came from sky. The message he said “is eternal truth and unalienable”. The Man message spread like grassland fire. Men tested The Man through their tradition and came to conclusion that he is one their own kind, who might be decedent of one of the numerous mission that were lost during the expansion age. The Man emphasised on the Lost Message and asked people to work for lost message rather than for him. Men from all around the vast land met and discussed with him. The Man with his charm influenced every one of them; some diagreed and some agreed. Convinced men rallied behind him. He travelled all across the known land learning things from various group and teaching new thing that he had learnt from The Lost Message. He was able to consolidate the social structure of the land into one. He gave new names to events, worships, and for processes, making communication shorter, understandable and brought some uniformity. He built up relationss with skilled mind of various tribes and brought them on unified platform. This platform became body where elders were able to discuss and solve some of the problem that society faced. On the suggestion of The Man, elders set mission to unify the land and bring under a single command . Unification was marked by agreement, voluntary submission, conditional submission and other methods which were unknown to society but was brought by The Man, which he said was the part of Lost Message. Other splinter groups who were treat were assimilated by war ,some time by assasination of leader, some time by corruting officials of chief of tribe, which ever method was deemed correct.

With the years of efforts by elders and politicking mind of The Man, finally land got united. Unity brought centrality, i became we . Uniformity became norms, diversity became devient. The Man defended this form of society for the greater good of larger people. He brought concept of sacrific for greater good and glorified it. People saw no harm in endorsing his idea as other solution were not giving stability. Stability has returned after much suffering and sacrifice-as The Man conceptualised it. Forces set by the new idea culminated into a tribal state, with central authority and an army. The state ;headed by council of elders:Deus,Dig,Das ,ruled fast land . Unified under the common command. As time was running out council of elders decided to address historically unsolved issue and directed to open the historical problem (as there was any script that time tribe had specialsed group of people who were tasked with memorising the important event and passing on to next generation in the form of stories-).

Deus being nominal head invited The Man for sharing his views and unearting the solution from The Lost Message. However tribal tradition allowed only son of the land to take such work. Moreover section of grand tribal society were decenting importance given to newcomer. To solve the stand of Deus decided to use the mole present in the tradition which allowed adoption of the son and no rule was made on adoted son rights. Deus adopted The Man as his son in a tribal ceremony, with the name Manus The son Of Deus.

Manus now as an entrusted man, had huge resposibility of finding way to non-availability of land. Deus once told him that whole stability of the unified people lies on the solution.Deus was guide and teacher for Manus with whom he used to share his ideas. Deus used have conversation in question and answer (as he deemed its the write method)format on various issues however restrained himself many times from asking Manus about The Lost Message. Deus always believed in Manus's in concept of going beyond the horizon and believed that this aspect has brought Manus to this land. He felt the land is secure and this great people ,will be the force of manus ,who will eventually find the solution. It took some time for Manus to adjust with new job whose rule were verbal deposited. Deus assigned Dig who being women was good in organisational skill and was key in bringing centrality , to assist Manus, Manus took it as sign and decided to organise an event to bring specialised people to work under Deus. This was to be fare were people would discuss things, would show talents, fighting skills, new herbal plants, fire controlling technique,food yelding techniqe, weapons,etc. This was open invitation to all corner of the land , which was being organised for the first time. Various groups and elders decided to meet on vast flat land just outside the place where council of elders was housed. Hundreds of families put there tent in that land which was cut by small streams. Various events went on from women warrior fighting men warriors to display of new animal captured in the land. People stayed there for weeks, which provided Dig and Manus to mark the skilled men and women and the skills itself, that could be needed to find the solution. During fare a pattern emerged which copied the recent events i.e now the place itself had council to over see the fair, basic necesity of food,shelter and water was taken care off. Residence were now in organised condition. Small protection force also protected the recidence. Miniaturised state was built and people started to call its Atsana. Dig saw a new system emerging which had division of labor, consists of various groups who were specialised in there own work but exchanged their labors mutually. Dig conceptualised first cosmopolitan city, born out of idea of Manus.

With coming of Manus in picture things have evolved: war were stopped, people got united, peace and stability returned, new big city by name “Atsana” was founded. People started to believe that time indeed is ripe to materialised the message in The Lost Message. Manus and Dig sensed the mood, with the permission of Deus, Das who was protector and warrior head of the council of elder was sent to spread the message of an invitation; an invitation as the first message of “The Lost Message”. Das, a self made man , a sceptic by nature hated phenomenon of blind following of leaders. Many a time he had opposed the pre destination which was engulping the society but this time allowed him self to not to oppose Manus worship(as he believed). Das trusted situation for the solution rather thann the pre destination. Being believer of self consciousness, he did discuss Manus phenomenon with Deus. Who in turn assure and asked Das to have faith in the young man.

It took some time for forces of Das to spread the message of Manus to choosen one (Some identified by Manus and Dig ) and in general to warriors(other came as voluteers.). Within weeks People pored into new established city of Atsana. Land to wards east of the city was given to the unorganised warriors and other skilled people. Manus was in between the crowd unable to organise . People although respected him but question of next haunted people. Seeing lack of Manus experience Dig and Das stepped in. It was new for them too, however there own experience of how Tsana was formed gave them the future path. Within hours of discussion , both came to conclusion of diffenciating, segregating and organising on the based of the common thing for this purpose. Question was to find the purpose; Manus was showing his inexperience which both realised and sought Deus intervention(hence went to house that housed council of elders).

In council of elders, Deus was having discussion with Vesu, the man who was instrumental in organising the Tsana city. Vesu being a merchant and retailer, was always know for his grouping skills which matched with changing situation and requirement. When Dig and Das entered council hall, humble vesu sought permission to suspend his discussion and went out, so that three heads can discuss the issue. Dig and Das explained the situation that is unfolding just east of the city. All three had seen situation like this before but this was lot different : had huge number -numbering in thousands, all type from warrior(the organised one) to alchemist were present, all level of boldness was present. It was becoming a recipe of spontenious revolt if not controlled and organised. What came out of discussion was need to organise the large crowd . Deus was able to see(Council house was on high ground over looking new city and crowd ) for himself, the growing need for cosmopolitan crowd control and people who can do so. Presence of Vesu made sense to Deus. After consulting Dig and Das, Vesu was asked to enter the discussion in the council hall. Vesu has sensed the help that council needed, which became clear during course of discussion. Deus was still testing the water, vesu got proposal from Dig regarding reorganising of the crowd. Though it wasn't unanimous suggestion, Deus and Das conformed to Dig's proposal. What moved them was Veus clarity and humbleness in analysing the proposal. Vesu had organisational questions before jumping to accept their proposal.

Vesu questions:
What is aim and objective of the organisation?
Who will be head of this and what kind of authority he/she have?
What part council and Manus play with respect to this organisation?
What are criteria of differnciation within organisation?
Maintenance of the same?
How organisation must proceed during choitic situation?
What will be relation of individual and organisation?

The question of Vesu cleared the smoke about vesu's outlook and were supporting plates for the proposal which the Deus and Das still had doubt. As problem was spontenous and unwarranted council wasn't prepared for the answers, however rule of sue moto readdressal was invoked(which was being followed when answer where to be sought from the questioner itself). Vesu after getting convinced that council had no answer, went a head with his proposal with all humbleness. Vesu made it clear that he himself dont have answer for much of the question but sought apply “ought to see when deemed necessary” principle, accordingly he would answer as on when situation arrive or situation get cleared. Council accepted his proposal and gave permission to take stock of the situation, however placed him under Manus and advised him to support Manus's effort. Vesu, after approval met Manus along with Dig among the what was to called by crowd as “Loya Gira” a grand council. Dig was more that happy to see two humble person working on the situation which even council can't think of. Dig saw it has first step towards division of power and share of responsibility. Two men had a long discussion, exchanged alot of information. Dig being well connected with centrality of society, was well fed with information of skills, technology, instrument and people connected with these things. Dig became repository to unearthen information which Manus and Vesu thought necessary for organising. After much of deliberation Manus and Vesu, now onwards the Dwi, came to conclusion that crowd would be divided based on skills rather than region, from which they belong. From the data ,which Dig has collected during previous fare, The Dwi decided to have each skilled group under certain men/ women (who are to be highly skilled in the same job).

It was time to convey the decision and make way for first line of organisational heads. Dig was lack of grandness of conveying decision which Dwi have left, hence he ordered a small platform to be made on the high ground facing crowd which council guards were quick to accomplish.Dig and Manus were not unknown to crowd but Vesu was, before Dig could start with introduction of Vesu, Vesu himself came oout with introduction as the head of the organisation which was going to be announced and he is working with the approval of council. Vesu took this opportunity to welcome all and thanking those who dreamt this. Vesu allowed Manus to begin with the core announcement which would define the aim, objective and criteria of organistion. Manus announced that an organsiation will be set up with the aim in line with aim of The Lost Message; ie to find solution for moving beyond this land, maintaining present order and peace of the land. He spelt that people will be segregated based on there skills and skill will be used for achiving the aims, giving prority to finding new land beyond mountains and sea. And he also added that these grouping will be called “Ganas” and will be lead by people appointed by them, who deemed fit and well scrutinised by them. Manus than allowed Vesu to announce Ganas and those who will be contacting council on behalf of them(as one amongs equal and leader). Vesu announced that he will spell out who will be representing organisation and categories of work under organisation and then(one by one).

Categories of Dwi were:

“Varuna”: Intelligence, law and order

.(Humbal, ethically uncorruptable ,was from fastest hordes of the north. Was part of Das messaing network, was brillent in identifying and training various animals to get things done , mapper and one who knows nature well:::: as described by Vesu to people )

“Agni” : Grassland care taker, wild fire preventer.
“Mitra” : would help Agni(Mitra was one of the son of Surya a tribal head: the far eastern tribe from colder area of land)

(Agni would be responsible for taking measure that would help in preventing fire in grassland there by giving more grass. He would also be responsible for preventing desert lands from spreading. Head of a group from easter land)

“Soma” : curing men/women. Also help Agni in picking useful herbs and protecting herbs with the help of Tvastra who was expert in herbs.

(basically soma was from tribal medic.)

“Yama” : sanitization which would include burying dead both human and aNimal: Yama was a tribe whose people were called and were part of society for burying dead and these were from south.
After all these anouncement there came final announcement which vesu left it for Dig. Dig announced that the organisation which she will annoounce will be fighting force, most of people will be part of it. It will be having more than one person over it. Primary objective is to explore the land beyond and this group will get every coordination from other groups. Main leaders she said will be

“Indra” : A most feared warrior, well know for fighting in all condition and expert in storming the defence during unwell condition such as snow storm, rain, thunderstorm etc. People thought that nothing could stop this young warrior.

“Pusan” : another son of Surya. Will be supporting Indra. Will be responsible for establishment of paths and taking inputs from Varuna. He was head of tribe which herded only along the roads hence were called as protector of roads by merachants of society.

“Aryaman” an young fighter will assist Indra.

“Rudra”: head of siegh machinary an expert in sabotage. Both physical and biological methods.

“Rbhus”: keeper of weapons.
... To Be Continued








Ukraine Crisis: Watershed in International Relation

Ukraine Crisis: Watershed in International Relation

International Relations cant be performed in lab hence Ukraine crisis is/will be taken as case study.

Back ground theories:

1. Post Westphalia world(for state supremacy)  
2. UN's right to self determination(which is a double edged sword )
3. Manner of referendum: is it UN backed, reason for referendum, post referendum scenario. Behaviouralism (leaders,; putin: is a realist, realist believe in concept of power) 

4. Nation - state theory


The way world look at nations is through Nation- state theory ie each nation(group of people who have sense of oneness created by forces of unification) must have a state and each state have single nation. this is post 1945 scenario. all around the world leaders have worked towards achieving this goal. hence Italy for italians, england for english, scotland for scotish etc. this concept has brought with it various measures to achieve this ; introduction of national language which is a soft method. eg:Hindi as language as we have many nations(identity both horizontal and vertical eg: kannadigas, yadavas, andras etc). there are hard and corrosive methods like people displace ment(carried pre WW1 and WW2, tartars or crimea are best examples ), ethnic cleansing (sudan's darfur region, kashmir (pandits issue),nazi germany etc). This madness of achieving theoretical assumption has what caused the ethnic wars, secession movements, wars etc. question is that Mr Putin fits to be case of behaviourialism. My view is that he is not but he used this Russian people for russian nation as galvanising force to correct the historic mistake of khrushchev(as said by Gorbachev a week ago). He is realist, former Lt Col of KGB, it was well planned strategy of Intergrationist. There are different views how intergration can be brought. EU ideology and Russian ideology is different in this.


New people in Kiev mainly Yatsenyuk has previously gave various interviews and maidan speeches where he said time and again about Ukraine for Ukranians, banning of russian language(trying to achive nation state monotonic idea), introducing english etc which he now back tracked. When revolutions happen language of revoltionaries must be of integrating however they were divisive. This crack in revolution was well used by Putin for securing Russia ,a secure and strategic black sea port.


from 1945 to till world has balkanised from 51 nations to 193+; all trying to achieve nation state paradigm. however in 2009, 3 philosopher has worked out state nation theory(one being yogendra yadav) to try to stop this madness. But effort of these 3 will in future go in vain. balkanisation will continue but point is where will be next success of nation state theory. i predict it EU itself. scots, catalonia, Venice, quebec in canada, falkland etc. hope indian will listen to Yogendra Yadav.


There is chinese proved "Long united must be divided and long divided must be united" its confusion ethics.

Kosovo case was Pandora box, secession is not followed by integration. real concern with respect to russia is integration. 2008 case of Georgia was clear case of new resurgent russia caving out its area of influence. west especially US is void of policy in unilateral world, it hasn't developed mechanising to contain rising power like china, India, Russia, Brazil etc. Concept of smart power was invention of Obama administration but it went back to hard power of regean era in solving ukraine issue way back in 2012 when it first emerged. Its forward policy that is in action in sphere of Russian influence. shocks therapy techniques are commonly used(crimea). concept of sphere of influence has its tool all round the world. latin america has suffered, south china has suffered, south asia has etc.There is no doubt that ukraine has right to decide as do nepal , bhutan while deciding which way they can go. Russian never followed NAM, however India followed and would follow this for its strategic autonomy in IR. question is can Bhutan or nepal use same NAM towards india.


and about cold war concept; every time there is any thing happening in power block people will come up with this concept ; cold war. they said same thing in 1980s this was new 2nd cold war. will post 2014 be 3 rd one. Cold war as its called is out come of security dilemma(best explained by prisoner dilemma) however in globalised or globalising world there are and will be tools to break this security dilemma. khrushev and kennedy used back channel as tool to break this dilemma. Integrated economy is and has become tool to break this build up to so called cold war. Russia in this direction will take first step ie by not moving towards economic sanction of EU and trade blockade. EU will reciprocate once dust settle down. US knows this will work and will be face savour for it. some day back i even heard of cold war in Asia. Ya people have right to idealise thing however realism has established itself in IR on Nation states.

Thursday, 23 January 2014

Beard Weird


(Written in 2012)

What the hell!!!.... why has he left so much?? Has he got dumped or what? Whats the matter with him ? Is there a personal issue???... Has he become psyco?..Is he following any deity….?? Or has he left it for a wish???....
Ha ha ha… these are some of the questions that I have been asked or listened. People these days see me with both curious and suspicious way. Curious is ok but what bother me is the suspicion. So what is this all about…. Or what topic does these question has meaning full answers. Its all about my “Beard” which I decided to leave at a weird time(in and around valentine days) . It’s about my Beard which made me Weird(in other eyes).
It all started with the Asch conformity experiment(sociology students know it better if not better to know). I always asked myself , whether I am or can be subjected to group conformity. I tried to find one such example ,where I can see social conformity. In a quest I found a startling evidence of existence in every walk of life, from morning till we go to bed. As IT professional I am happy to announce that here also conformity dances. Conformity(in IT) is synonym to social cloning. We have same behaviour , same psychology, ideas , mentality etc. This cloning is so wide spread that if a non clone ie those who doesn’t get conformed or deviant character are looked as the enemy cell of the immune system (society). 


Being non-conform doesn’t mean being deviant. It’s the problem of conformity group not to take non-conform’s character as one of its own character. It is said that both(non-conformity and deviance) supplement each other. However my own experience tell me that former is cause and later is the effect. 


So was it just like that or was it intentional??... one of observation that I made about deviant characters is that , they are not random. Some pattern or planning is always required(knowingly or unknowingly) to be non- conformable, this non-conformity yields some sense of deviance in once character. I better remind readers that it’s the majority that always call the minority a deviant character, rather minority character calling themselves. Even though most of our moves are conformable in nature. I always try to identify those I make. Its very tough to be non- conformable . It indeed requires a lot of confidence and positive attitude to wards yourself and your nature. Non-conformable people are those , who doesn’t breakdown easily(its my view not to be generalized. Lot of research has to be carried out to come to general conclusion , where all attributes influencing subject is taken into consideration). Hence in my view deviant character are non random and do have pattern .


Now question arises “Being clean shaved(beard)” is one of the conformable social act. I have gone through history , social life of people of various time and foreign influence other parameters that can give clue of the beard clad men. Historically and sociologically we had a group (which unfortunately became barber caste), which used to carry out shaving activity. This makes us to conclude that previously people of both shaved and unshaved exist and unshaved character was not called deviant. Rajas maharajas, common people used to leave beard and mustaches both in Indian and all over the world. People never used to have suspicious look over those who used to keep it. So what made same old character that persisted before came to known as deviant character. And why at this point the social attitude has changed.


While going through some of the photos of the Pre-British era, British era and Post-British era, I noticed a slow and gradual change of appearance both in British officers and Indian Elites. Change in Indian elites became more predominant during Independence time and post-independence. Indian elites who were the external interface of Indian society with British were the first to adapt “Gentle men“ look. Gentle men look itself came with the package (package explanation out of scope), which included “Being clean shave”. This character as outward character ,is the most influential character. As the time passed it formed one of the norm of British administration that was followed by most of British officers. This eventually got applied to the Indians serving British. As the character of the superior forces were always admired, applying such character by individual or group , brought some favour from superior forces. This also helped in achieving behavioral mobility for certain section of the society. Favourism and mobility nature of this character (BCSb “Being Clean Shaved(beard)”) has lead to spreading of this, all over the society. With more than 300 year+ of its existence as “Gentle Men” character, this has developed into dominant character against which most cant go and hence a conformative character. 


Entertainment sector, media and Gentle Men character


Entertainment sector which has huge influence, has always nurtured Gentle men character and with time, knowingly or unknowingly non Gentle men character has been crafted and showed as a bad character. There by, entertainment sector had started a mass conformable process. Adding to it is demonizing non- Gentle men(keeping beard) character by media. If you want a criminal or looter or terrorist just bring a figure with having beard or shabby look, and people with no question start to believe that. People that I have observed most time try to find non gentle men character in the criminal and most of time this try is intentional. Another misconception that runs around in society is that people having beard(excessive) are muslims(else sikh if they “pagdi”). This is one of the effect of Islamophobia .

Modern industry, especially IT sector has used this character to commoditize its employee. I really appreciate that all IT employees have become “Gentle men” at the stake of their freedom of carrying once look. It make me laugh when I see information posted with regards to adhering to “clean shave” policy on notice board in my company. When enquired about the information , people tell that exception are made if you are sikh or Mohammadian or on religious basis . Here even beard gets communalized(communalization is Indian gift to British dictionary). The same people doesn’t question if the style (beard style) is French. This is again Orientalism, which is westernization rather then modernization (both terms are different and sociological term which are out of scope). 


Conformity of “Gentle men” character in my surrounding (which include society and IT sector) is such that; if some body with enough beard(in this case myself. I had been keeping this beard since last month) walks along the street . People feel it hard to believe that such people do work in IT company. Some people even think that I am of different religion or of different region(especially of Bihar). I have been having some of the interesting experience with this look, both with known and unknown people. Some of them are listed below.


• People gave me different names such as Surendra Singh, psyco, baba, devdas, swamiji, some even called me Nityananda(this was hilarious).
• Some people compaired photo present in old Id card and new look.
• People to whom ever I met, every body had only one question.Whats this?Why this?
• Some asked ..Have you been dumped? As I developed this look in march.
• Some asked religious or Baptist reason or some ideologist or following some deity.
• Some even said that,I might have been drinking a lot (although it was irrelevant joke, but for a person who studies sociology, its tough to ignore ).


Most of time I never told anything, giving them time to come to conclusion. By doing this there natural comparison can be brought and idea imposition will be nullified. This eventually help us to know which image(got form various sources or influence by various media) will suit my look and their imagination. Hence most of answer they themselves gave were listed in first point along with other which better be with myself , so that it reminds me of hilarious but suspicious mind of the people.
Some of the most weird thing that happened were.
• When I was sitting at the back of auto(shared auto in Hyderabad), a beautiful young lady came and asked service to driver. I was lone passenger and every criteria for a drop matched. As she was about to get in , she suddenly got out and moved towards another auto. I thought this can’t happen due to my look and thought as an isolated act. But in a week , I was made to realized that pretty lady doesn’t necessarily want to travel or be comfortable co-passenger.
• While I was walking along the road in madhapur, Hyderabad. A muslim youth who wore a traditional dress, whished me. It wasn’t of any surprise for me as I had beard thinknesss much more then him. In return to the respect I replied back with same notion ie “walikum Aslam”(diff people say diff but I spell like this).
• Not to forget curious eyes, un-interrupted and un-intensional looks of passer by. This remind me of one scene of film “Inception”, when Ellen Page as Ariadne starts to modify the dream world (Leonardo DiCaprio dream) while walking along with Leonardo and all of a sudden projection in dream starts to stair at Ariadne and Leonardo explains her how modification made by her is treated as alien by his projection and also cautious her about this.

There were countless such experience which were both hilarious and non. Some of them better be bind to my memory, darker part of these interpretation must be left to my mind itself which formulated this experiment. However I am interested in how a gentle men character was turned into non-gentle men character without actually being the one. Every one asked me for the reason for having beard(only 1 or 2 had a serious doubt on my intention. It show clarity of their thought). Should there be a reason always?... No I suppose. Even if exist(in my case it experiment), it can or can’t be same as society expects it to be. This is not so systematic sociological study , however I can make out things like :
• Society as a group and individuals are pre-occupied with the things(here gentle man character).
• Unknowingly most of the things or characters are being made conformable and no one is asking or asked why so? NO one is asking why are we made to follow the things.
• Most of interaction between unknown depends on the first look. media has created such a prejudice of non-Gentle men character that , most of interaction are spoiled by this prejudice .
• Given an option to judge about the people based on look, majority of people starts judging with bad notion rather than good.
• In city like Hyderabad, leaving beard increases your identity and respect from certain section of the people. Autowalas and other class of people shows more respect then usual. This beard has helped me to increase bhai chara in certain sector.


If a very systematic study involving various parameters involving in social conformity is carried out , we can get some of the striking evidence of how prejudice our society has become and gets clue how mob gets mobilized during violence or during chaos, how riots gets built up . In all these case we see common people with pre-occupied mind (that was casted by media and its family) has resulted in a syndrome which I can call as “Acquired Social Prejudice Syndrome”. A society built on this very notion , will and is weak and vulnerable to chaotic situations. I have tried to study this syndrome with what ever I had. This may be small but yield some of the striking effect of this syndrome and how it is spreading. There are lot other parameters that effect this syndrome , which has to be studied extensively. “Islamophobia” is one such result of this syndrome. If left uncheck for a long time this can shake the very foundation of our society.

Friday, 10 January 2014

The Idea of “COMMON”


The Idea of “COMMON”

Societies are built on ideas, the ideas that were the result of intuition and discussion among groups… Groups; some are small, some big. Some intelligent, some mandabuddhi .We all are part of one or the other group. Various topics are discussed by various groups. Some discuss all that comes under sun; from lady to lakadi , some restrict to serious things. In all (most serious one) discussion, some where in the middle, some one will drop a word “COMMON+ bla bla”. This common+ or common++ (eg. Common sense,”lets talk about something that is common”,common man, common social ideology)are like anti aircraft instrument which will bring any aeroplane down(most of time jo banda bat kata rehat hai uski lag jata hai).I hope people have experienced this. Aur yebhi sach hai ki, in every group there are people who know where to, when to fire the anti aircraft guns. Muje “common+bla bla” se koyi problem nahi hai, problem iss batka hai ki, whether we really understand what “common+ or common++” stand for. Is word “common” is so common to use. Is idea of common, equal to idea of majoritism or democracy. Does individualism hurts common feeling or vice verse. Does idea personal sphere be opened to idea of common or should there be limit to common or personal or both ideas. Or should idea of “COMMON” be imposed or let personal space be absorbed in common. In the oceans of views, mine is small try, people can add their views.


Idea of common, can’t be so common. There has to be something that define the common. For me , Its elements (of subject) that define common. element or elements of comparison define the vastness of the definition of common . While comparing 2 person, elements of comparison may be few and therefore may be common in few, more the common ness more you are common to the compared one. But what, when comparing a group, a colony, a city, a society , a religion or human kind. Vastness of definition depends on the no of elements taken for comparison. Hence when we speak about common man that to with reference to people in India, we better be aware what we are speaking and on whose be-half. Most people have a belief that they represent the common man, his aspiration and need. Its not their mistake, its herd effect. People being the part of group doesn’t venture much or develop much 1-1 relation beyond certain limit. Research say that a person don’t maintain 1-1 relation with not more than 80-90. People make Generalization of the confined group applying the same to the universe.Universe is very vast and diverse to be generalized. Even while solving the problems, assumption and generalization are good for getting answer what is required rather than what it is . Most of discussion tends to have large number of assumption. However world is not sphere of assumption. Assuming and solving problem has its inherent flaws. However every thing cant be taken in real scenario. Assumption if made must be near to reality and sample taken as to variability of the universe. Which people fail to do so. Sampling and its quality is also key thing. Any thing that is to be generalized has to have a subject that is 1) objective 2) quantifiable 3) valid frame work. People make use of pain taking research, carried over period of some years, to come to generalization on social issues. Its this idea, that restrain me from generalizing things using Idea of “COMMON”. So, Is the assumption and generalization of elements of such a small number by people using “idea of common”, be deemed correct? Even if we add information, that person has collected, then what percent of elements of generalization is possible. I am not saying that we cant come to generalization, my point is , generalization need study, a study that involves all the stack holders of the subject and conclusion excepted by majority involved.


Idea of “COMMON” is a feeling that make people one among themselves. It has to be taken in aggregated sense rather than as a presumption of section of people. It is equally true that those who make much noise, will be able to put forward their version when subject feature is anarchy or undefined. Even in democracy minority views are respected or atleast are given chance to be expressed. While in majoritism people know which way to go. There will be no clandestine. Idea of common is like lamb under lion’s skin. Ideas are ideas, but what makes different is proponents of idea.Eg. antisemitism was present well before Hitler was even born but it was orator like him who gave devilish face to anti semitism. Idea of “COMMON” can be glorified by best orator. Its impossible for people not to believe such voice, but point is ; Is it right to accept without scrutinizing? Is it right to except all without voicing decent, when there exist enough content that threatens the idea of being “YOU”.
Sphere of personal or private is an idea that has linear relation with the growth of the society and its commitment to individual freedom. Freedom in conservative society is cusp of Individual freedom and society at large. Sphere of personal or private is element of the Individual freedom. As society mature, freedom will be respected with respect to the personal sphere. People some time ridicule those who distinguish personal sphere from community sphere or who introduce choice in the personal sphere. Personal sphere has grown over years and will continue to grow, adding things present other sphere. These ideas of society cant be made back benchers as these have strong assertive forces. I have seen people taking this idea aboard as on when required or case maybe. Point is simple personal sphere of others much not be encroached.
Personal sphere may be new and worrying concept with respect to community within freedom framework. This expression is protectionism and somewhere linked to the defeatist attitude. Defeatist attitude must not over shadow once broader understanding of society . People have ways to win, which has to be respected at all cost. Defeatist attitude must not venture in the presumptive area and draw vulgarity to the success. And about Protectionism, it doesn’t add value to society or add developmental story to the society, in this respect. Human being by nature are “Self”. It’s the degree of self that defines whether ideology is “Right” or “Left”. Those who think of being champions of community sphere fails to follow basic rule of consultation and ideology of midway. Lack of these lead to a presumption which gives idea of pseudo-moderator or pseudo-leader. World has seen a lot of such leaders, at individual level it effect personal sphere of others and imposition of Idea of “COMMON” on the personal sphere. Those who oppose and try to create awareness are labelled as morally corrupt, dis-illusion ed, ideologically degraded and worst case “Instigator” or infidel or outsider. Point is not, being called like that, but the point is about respecting each others ideology. Ideological tolerance which has to be one of the core element of community sphere , appears to clouded. This has to be revoked . I vow my ideological tolerance to personal sphere concept.


Right to freedom does include Right to individual freedom, however proponents of Idea of “COMMON” fail to respect that. Personal sphere has been back bencher not only in society but even in the policies that we see. India being a jewel of diversity must apply the Idea of “COMMON” with broader perspective. Absorption of personal sphere in the name of community or Idea of “COMMON” is a dangerous precedent. The Idea of “COMMON” represents shallowness of the opinion among some section of the society. It is baffling if it comes from learned one. Deep ignorance of anything that is outside their sphere of influence can provide hyperlink to stunted growth in the Idea of “COMMON”. Ignorance is not confined to lower stratum of society but also percolates the well read section of the society ie so called Elites of the society. Ignorance cant be passed on, as this is not the age of ignorance. Reading of literature related to various aspect of society, who it works, what necessary for its growth, whats necessary for social upliftment etc could help in clearing once view and understanding others. If not Idea of “COMMON” seems to be a primitive response of shrugging your shoulders and saying that some things are beyond once comprehension. Proponents of Idea of “COMMON” are undermining the diversity there by insulting both diversity and the idea itself.

Shivaprakash Yaragal